Book a call

Victor Jaques · Psychologist FSP, assessment, coaching and HR consulting

Tools in service of the interview

Psychometric tests, inventories and interview aids, chosen according to the question asked. They inform the conversation, and never replace it.

Here are the ones I use, by need. The list evolves with my practice.

Book a call See the instruments →

Twenty minutes free · French-speaking Switzerland (Lausanne, Fribourg), Bern or by video call

PHOTO 9 · LANDSCAPE 3:2

The tools: questionnaires and rating grids on the table, Victor blurred in the background.

Where to start?

Four needs, and what I offer for each: when, for what, in which format.

  • I want to recruit for a sensitive role. Look beyond the CV, decide with confidence.

  • I want to help my team or a key person grow. Develop potential through tailored support.

  • I want to make the best choice for an internal role. Promote with confidence, make the transition work.

  • I want to improve the way we evaluate. Spot what is holding you back, redesign it together.

01

Recruitment

I want to recruit for a sensitive role

Look beyond the CV, decide with confidence.

Who it is for Managers who recruit, to decide with more information, and HR, to place people who stay in their role.

Discuss your situationDiscover recruitment →

Semi-structured interviews

When
To secure a sensitive hire.
What you receive
  • An interview guide specific to your roles
  • A prepared panel, which observes and rates the same things
  • My participation in the interview
Format
Preparation, panel briefing and delivery

Recruitment assessment

When
To decide between finalists.
What you receive
  • Simulations close to the real role
  • A clear summary, centered on observed behaviors
  • Feedback to the person assessed, if they wish
Format
Half a day to a day, summary within 24 hours
02

Coaching

I want to help my team or a key person grow

Develop potential through tailored support.

Who it is for HR and managers who want to develop their talent and prepare succession, to invest in the right people.

Discuss your situationDiscover coaching →

Coaching

When
To step back, take a step forward or progress on a specific area, for anyone the organization is betting on. For example, when taking up a role, widening a scope or growing a team.
What you receive
  • Goals set by three people (the person, the manager and me)
  • A confidential space to reflect, try out new ways of doing things between sessions, and adjust
  • A summary validated by the person, handed over at the closing session
  • A person more autonomous at the end than at the start
Format
Short: six sessions. Long: nine sessions. Three-way kick-off and closing sessions included.
03

Development assessment

I want to make the best choice for an internal role

Promote with confidence, make the transition work.

Who it is for HR departments that organize succession or want to retain their talent.

Discuss your situationDiscover the development assessment →

Development assessment

When
Before a promotion, on entering a talent pool, or to objectify potential.
What you receive
  • A snapshot of strengths and development areas
  • Suggestions for support and development
  • Feedback to the organization, free of jargon, with a clear position
Format
Half a day to a day, summary within 24 hours
04

Evaluation process

I want to improve the way we evaluate

Spot what is holding you back, redesign it together.

Who it is for HR departments, and those in charge of recruitment, succession or evaluation.

Discuss your situationDiscover the evaluation process →

Revise an evaluation process

When
When a process (recruitment, annual reviews, promotions) produces contested or unsuccessful decisions, or uses too many resources for the result obtained.
What you receive
  • A diagnosis of your situation (strengths and development areas)
  • A process redesigned with the people who keep it alive
  • Support with implementation
  • Follow-up over time: indicators, analysis of results, adjustments
Format
Analysis, design, implementation, follow-up, quote-based

Talent pool and succession plan

When
To optimize or build an internal mobility system: identifying potential, talent review, succession plan, rules for moving from one role to another.
What you receive
  • A shared diagnosis of your situation (strengths and development areas)
  • A system co-built with the competent people in your organization, adapted to your context
  • Tools your teams can and will want to take over
  • Follow-up over time: indicators, review after a first cycle, adjustments
Format
Quote-based

Online tests and inventories

When
To choose which tests or inventories to put in place, or to better interpret and use their results.
What you receive
  • A selection of validated tools, adapted to your needs
  • A setup that supports a good candidate experience (consent, data processing, feedback to the people) and real added value for the organization
  • Results your HR team can interpret and explain consistently, thanks to training: clear interpretation limits, clear definitions and concepts
Format
Quote-based

How I choose a tool

  • According to the question asked.

    A tool enters the process when it sheds light on a precise point, and never out of habit.

  • Never alone.

    It is always read with the person, in an interview. It enriches the view they have of themselves and supports the discussion, before any decision.

Scientific sources

Every tool and practice relies on scientific work and recognized good practice. Here are a few landmarks.

  • Semi-structured interviews. An interview designed in advance, with a shared rating grid, predicts performance better than an unstructured interview. Sackett et al. (2022); Levashina et al. (2014)

  • Assessment. Simulations rated by behavior dimension predict job performance. Arthur et al. (2003); Meriac et al. (2008)

  • 360° feedback and coaching. Feedback supported by a coach has more effect than feedback handed over alone. Coaching has measured positive effects on the person coached. Luthans & Peterson (2003); Theeboom et al. (2014); Jones et al. (2016); Smither et al. (2003)

  • Cost of a poor choice. The performance gap between two people in the same role grows with the complexity of the role, and a person’s departure weighs on the organization’s results. Hunter et al. (1990); Hancock et al. (2013)

See the scientific sources →

What never changes

  • The rules of the game are set before the first session: what is shared with the organization, what stays confidential.

  • Each person knows, before starting, what will be passed on and to whom.

  • Scientifically validated tools, in service of the interview, never in its place.

  • Compliance with the code of ethics of the Swiss Federation of Psychologists.

  • A framework contract with the organization, a three-party agreement for coaching, announced flat fees, a quote for projects.

  • Data processed and hosted in Switzerland or Germany, in line with the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection and the General Data Protection Regulation.

Questions about the tools

Are Victor Jaques’s tools scientifically validated?

Yes, the measurement instruments Victor Jaques uses are chosen for their documented psychometric quality. His grids, plans and working tools are interview aids: they help structure the conversation, without claiming to objectify the person. These tools complement the dialogue, they do not replace it. The scientific references used appear in the Scientific sources section of the Tools page.

How are evaluation tools presented to the people assessed?

Each document handed over (questionnaire, plan, 360° summary) is presented before it is used, then discussed with the person assessed: what it measures, what it does not measure, and what they think of it. The other aids are used only to prepare and run the interview.

All questions →

What happens next?

A first conversation to clarify your needs, then a written proposal where appropriate: announced flat fee or quote. You then decide.